Testimonia

Publiek archief van verzamelde en verwerkte bronrecords.
Overzicht / Records / record

native-commentary-introduction-unreviewed

Technische verwerking bevestigt geen inhoudelijke beoordeling of toestemming voor openbare publicatie.

record_key: 6780fd21d5bcbef96a9df6d2c2afde98f72d499328868bcd008dfaf655019a22
origineel ID: sermonindex-native-api:api/c/keil-delitzsch/NUM/32.json#$/chapter/introduction · verwerkingsstatus: Verwerkt, inhoudelijk nog niet beoordeeld · teksthash: c0893b7eb0a5ca5f7bf2e7e01be125a833bb40e8fe135bdc4a613f8a7409feee · 1,660 tekens

Tekst tekstblob openen

Division of the Conquered Land Beyond the Jordan Among the Tribes of Reuben, Gad, and Half-Manasseh - Numbers 32 (Note: This chapter is also cut in pieces by Knobel: Num 32:1, Num 32:2, Num 32:16-19, Num 32:24, Num 32:28-30, and Num 32:33-38, being assigned to the Elohist; and the remainder, viz., Num 32:3-5, Num 32:6-15, Num 32:20-23, Num 32:25-27, Num 32:31, Num 32:32, and Num 32:39-42, to the Jehovist. But as the supposed Elohistic portions are fragmentary, inasmuch as it is assumed, for example, in Num 32:19, that the tribes of Reuben and Gad had already asked for the land of the Jordan and been promised it by Moses, whereas there is nothing of the kind stated in Num 32:1 and Num 32:2, the Elohistic account is said to have been handed down in a fragmentary state. The main ground for this violent hypothesis is the fancy of the critic, that the tribes mentioned could not have been so shameless as to wish to remain on the eastern side of the Jordan, and leave the conquest of Canaan to the other tribes, and that the willingness to help their brethren to conquer Canaan which they afterwards express in Num 32:16., is irreconcilable with their previous refusal to do this, - arguments which need no refutation for an unprejudiced reader of the Bible who is acquainted with the selfishness of the natural heart. The arguments founded upon the language employed are also all weak. Because there are words in Num 32:1 and Num 32:29, which the critics pronounce to be Jehovistic, they must proceed, both here and elsewhere, to remove all that offends them with their critical scissors, in order that they may uphold the full force of their dicta!)

Versies (1)

Versie e4f5fd1cb5f157c29444afa1d914493f5b1e2ced7fe7f123154cf5d28e9e6121
{"api_compact_wrapper_recipe":"native-api-generated-wrapper-v1","api_source_document_ref":"f4f1608a2780fb3e58226ed4c4170e0ce46fb8d711d8a2ddc9b8b6d93d2dde81","id":"sermonindex-native-api:api/c/keil-delitzsch/NUM/32.json#$/chapter/introduction","native_JSON_pointer":"$/chapter/introduction","native_content_joiner":"\n\n","native_content_part_lengths":[1660],"native_reference":{"book":{"context_sha256":"45a5615c2a4852ecce3bf89ecb666d3a1acc0b05a0083ba0781ae332bae11746","native_id":"NUM"},"chapter":32,"unit_number":null,"unit_type":"native-chapter-introduction"},"native_unit_metadata":{"type":"native-chapter-introduction"},"native_unit_payload_sha256":"0fb8217aa3170a2a75843fdf60b407a2556fc473407b93abd25b87d4405e0c2e","original_identifier_basis":"existing native API member + JSON pointer","public_import_allowed":false,"reading_text_policy":"Native full content strings preserved, with explicit double-newline joins and exact part lengths; no stripping, snippet recursion, canonical verse inference or translation.","record_type":"native-commentary-introduction-unreviewed","references":[],"review_status":"structural-native-unit-unreviewed","semantic_kind_reviewed":false}

references: [] | work_id: keil-delitzsch | origin: native-api-commentary-structural-extraction | source: /api/c/keil-delitzsch/NUM/32.json

Plaatsingen (1)

OrdinalInputVersie
$/chapter/introduction7957e4f5fd1cb5f157c29444afa1d914493f5b1e2ced7fe7f123154cf5d28e9e6121

Bijbelverwijzingen (0)

CoördinaatReferentie

Live-status (1)

Live IDStatusMatchesSchema
sermonindex-native-api:api/c/keil-delitzsch/NUM/32.json#$/chapter/introductionprocessed_not_found_in_observed_live0