Canon XX.
If
any one shall, from a
presumptuous disposition, condemn and abhor the assemblies [in honour]
of the martyrs, or the services performed there, and the commemoration
of them, let him be anathema.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon XX.
Whoever thinks lightly of the meetings in honour of the
holy martyrs, let him be anathema.
Hefele.
Van Espen is of opinion that the Eustathians had
generally rejected the common service as only fit for the less perfect,
and that the martyr chapels are only mentioned here, because in old
times service was usually held there. According to this view, no
especial weight need be attached to the expression. But this
canon plainly speaks of a disrespect shown by the Eustathians to the
martyrs. Compare the twelfth article of the Synodal Letter.
Fuchs thought that, as the Eustathians resembled the Aerians, who
rejected the service for the dead, the same views might probably be
ascribed to the Eustathians. But, in the first place, the Aerians
are to be regarded rather as opposed than related in opinion to the
Eustathians, being lax in contrast to these ultra-rigorists.
Besides which, Epiphanius only says
that they rejected prayer for the salvation of the souls of the
departed, but not that they did not honour the martyrs; and there is
surely a great difference between a feast in honour of a saint, and a
requiem for the good of a departed soul. Why, however, the
Eustathians rejected the veneration of martyrs is nowhere stated;
perhaps because they considered themselves as saints,
κατ᾽
ἐξοχήν
, exalted above the
martyrs, who were for the most part only ordinary Christians, and many
of whom had lived in marriage, while according to Eustathian views no
married person could be saved, or consequently could be an object of
veneration.
Lastly, it must be observed that the first meaning of
σύναξις
, is an
assembly for divine service, or the service itself; but here it seems
to be taken to mean
συναγωγή
the
place of worship, so that the
συνάξεις
τῶν
μαρτύρων
seems to be
identical with
martyria
, and different from the
λειτουργίαι
held in them, of which the latter words of the canon speak.