{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1887,"date_label":"1887 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1887,"edition_year":1887,"edition_year_basis":"Original NPNF I V title and imprint 1887; physical transcription printing date uncertain; per-work translator allocation unspecified","id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy, editorial note cite_note-33","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":["To the number of those who had been rescued from Pelagianism by his efforts, Augustin was now to have the pleasure of adding two others, in whom he seems to have taken much delight. Timasius and James were two young men of honorable birth and liberal education, who had, by the exhortation of Pelagius, been moved to give up the hope that they had in this world, and enter upon the service of God in an ascetic life. Naturally, they had turned to him for instruction, and had received a book to which they had given their study. They met somewhere with some of Augustin’s writings, however, and were deeply affected by what he said as to grace, and now began to see that the teaching of Pelagius opposed the grace of God by which man becomes a Christian. They gave their book, therefore, to Augustin, saying that it was Pelagius’, and asking him for Pelagius’ sake, and for the sake of the truth, to answer it. This was done, and the resulting book, On Nature and Grace, sent to the young men, who returned a letter of thanks in which they professed their conversion from their error. In this book, too, which was written in 415, Augustin refrained from mentioning Pelagius by name, feeling it better to spare the man while not sparing his writings. But he tells us, that, on reading the book of Pelagius to which it was an answer, it became clear to him beyond any doubt that his teaching was distinctly anti-Christian; and when speaking of his own book privately to a friend, he allows himself to call it “a considerable book against the heresy of Pelagius, which he had been constrained to write by some brethren whom he had persuaded to adopt his fatal error, denying the grace of Christ.” Thus his attitude towards the persons of the new teachers was becoming ever more and more strained, in despite of his full recognition of the excellent motives that might lie behind their “zeal not according to knowledge.” This treatise opens with a recognition of the zeal of Pelagius, which, as it burns most ardently against those who, when reproved for sin, take refuge in censuring their nature, Augustin compares with the heathen view as expressed in Sallust’s saying, “the human race falsely complains of its own nature,” and which he charges with not being according to knowledge, and proposes to oppose by an equal zeal against all attempts to render the cross of Christ of none effect. He then gives a brief but excellent summary of the more important features of the catholic doctrine concerning nature and grace (2–7). Opening the work of Pelagius, which had been placed in his hands, he examines his doctrine of sin, its nature and effects. Pelagius, he points out, draws a distinction, sound enough in itself, between what is “possible” and what is “actual,” but applies it unsoundly to sin, when he says that every man has the possibility of being without sin (8–9), and therefore without condemnation. Not so, says Augustin; an infant who dies unbaptized has no possibility of salvation open to him; and the man who has lived and died in a land where it was impossible for him to hear the name of Christ, has had no possibility open to him of becoming righteous by nature and free will. If this be not so, Christ is dead in vain, since all men then might have accomplished their salvation, even if Christ had never died (10). Pelagius, moreover, he shows, exhibits a tendency to deny the sinful character of all sins that are impossible to avoid, and so treats of sins of ignorance as to show that he excuses them (13–19). When he argues that no sin, because it is not a substance, can change nature, which is a substance, Augustin replies that this destroys the Saviour’s work,—for how can He save from sins if sins do not corrupt? And, again, if an act cannot injure a substance, how can abstention from food, which is a mere act, kill the body? In the same way sin is not a substance; but God is a substance,—yea, the height of substance, and only true sustenance of the reasonable creature; and the consequence of departure from Him is to the soul what refusal of food is to the body (22). To Pelagius’ assertion that sin cannot be punished by more sin, Augustin replies that the apostle thinks differently (Rom. i. 21–31). Then putting his finger on the main point in controversy, he quotes the Scriptures as declaring the present condition of man to be that of spiritual death. “The truth then designates as dead those whom this man declares to be unable to be damaged or corrupted by sin,—because, forsooth, he has discovered sin to be no substance!” (25). It was by free will that man passed into this state of death; but a dead man needs something else to revive him,—he needs nothing less than a Vivifier. But of vivifying grace, Pelagius knew nothing; and by knowing nothing of a Vivifier, he knows nothing of a Saviour; but rather by making nature of itself able to be sinless, he glorifies the Creator at the expense of the Saviour (39). Next is examined Pelagius’ contention that many saints are enumerated in the Scriptures as having lived sinlessly in this world. While declining to discuss the question of fact as to the Virgin Mary (42), Augustin opposes to the rest the declaration of John in 1 John i. 8, as final, but still pauses to explain why the Scriptures do not mention the sins of all, and to contend that all who ever were saved under the Old Testament or the New, were saved by the sacrificial death of Christ, and by faith in Him (40–50). Thus we are brought, as Augustin says, to the core of the question, which concerns, not the fact of sinlessness in any man, but man’s ability to be sinless. This ability Pelagius affirms of all men, and Augustin denies of all “unless they are justified by the grace of God through our Lord Jesus Christ and Him crucified” (51). Thus, the whole discussion is about grace, which Pelagius does not admit in any true sense, but places only in the nature that God has made (52). We are next invited to attend to another distinction of Pelagius’, in which he discriminates sharply between the nature that God has made, the crown of which is free will, and the use that man makes of this free will. The endowment of free will is a “capacity;” it is, because given by God in our making, a necessity of nature, and not in man’s power to have or not have. It is the right use of it only, which man has in his power. This analysis, Pelagius illustrates at length, by appealing to the difference between the possession and use of the various bodily senses. The ability to see, for instance, he says, is a necessity of our nature; we do not make it, we cannot help having it; it is ours only to use it. Augustin criticises this presentation of the matter with great sharpness (although he is not averse to the analysis itself),—showing the inapplicability of the illustrations used,—for, he asks, is it not possible for us to blind ourselves, and so no longer have the ability to see? and would not many a man like to control the “use” of his “capacity” to hear when a screechy saw is in the neighbourhood? (55); and as well the falsity of the contention illustrated, since Pelagius has ignored the fall, and, even were that not so, has so ignored the need of God’s aid for all good, in any state of being, as to deny it (56). Moreover, it is altogether a fallacy, Augustin argues, to contend that men have the “ability” to make every use we can conceive of our faculties. We cannot wish for unhappiness; God cannot deny Himself (57); and just so, in a corrupt nature, the mere possession of a faculty of choice does not imply the ability to use that faculty for not sinning. “Of a man, indeed, who has his legs strong and sound, it may be said admissibly enough, ‘whether he will or not, he has the capacity of walking;’ but if his legs be broken, however much he may wish, he has not the ‘capacity.’ The nature of which our author speaks is corrupted” (57). What, then, can he mean by saying that, whether we will or not, we have the capacity of not sinning,—a statement so opposite to Paul’s in Rom. vii. 15? Some space is next given to an attempted rebuttal by Pelagius of the testimony of Gal. v. 17, on the ground that the “flesh” there does not refer to the baptized (60–70); and then the passages are examined which Pelagius had quoted against Augustin out of earlier writers,—Lactantius (71), Hilary (72), Ambrose (75), John of Constantinople (76), Xystus,—a blunder of Pelagius, who quoted from a Pythagorean philosopher, mistaking him for the Roman bishop Sixtus (57), Jerome (78), and Augustin himself (80). All these writers, Augustin shows, admitted the universal sinfulness of man,—and especially he himself had confessed the necessity of grace in the immediate context of the passage quoted by Pelagius. The treatise closes (82 sq.) with a noble panegyric on that love which God sheds abroad in the heart, by the Holy Ghost, and by which alone we can be made keepers of the law."],"source_library_url":"/library/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd/#ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-33","translator":"Peter Holmes (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Robert Ernest Wallis (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Benjamin B. Warfield (translation reviser and introduction author), Philip Schaff (series editor)","verification":{"proof_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0060/proof-records.jsonl","proof_file_sha256":"5ab7515afe3bdd69d27d5f8dcf7a632bd04e61bfac727cfe98b438bd75cdb4ce","proof_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33"},"verified":true,"work":"Introductory Essay","work_id":"ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd"}
{"author":"Historical editor/translator (individual note author unspecified)","date_end":1887,"date_label":"1887 (historical English edition; transcription printing date uncertain)","date_start":1887,"edition_year":1887,"edition_year_basis":"Original NPNF I V title and imprint 1887; physical transcription printing date uncertain; per-work translator allocation unspecified","id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33","is_genuine_commentary_verified":false,"license_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Reusing_Wikisource_content","public_import_allowed":true,"publication_location":"source-library","record_type":"editorial-footnote","references":[],"rights_approved":true,"section":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy, editorial note cite_note-33","semantic_kind_reviewed":false,"source_context":[{"$text_sha256":"355b283044a6e33c1729d11be3d70e745e104da3aae24c31ca333fffe5d77ccb"}],"source_library_url":"/library/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd/#ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33","source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy#cite_note-33","translator":"Peter Holmes (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Robert Ernest Wallis (edition translator credit; work allocation unspecified), Benjamin B. Warfield (translation reviser and introduction author), Philip Schaff (series editor)","verification":{"note":{"backlink_hrefs":["#cite_ref-33"],"body_html":{"$text_sha256":"7993bd43f39c173baa9c0fffa2db1e8214badd94a7294e7c8dffcb1aff82bbee"},"body_xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[33]/span[2]","container_html":{"$text_sha256":"7bf72494b8e80a7c032bde64504b2d6d1f8112ae24ef40390c22d438f4cf83fe"},"container_xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[33]","id":"cite_note-33"},"original_work_coordinate":{"actual_original_callouts":[{"backlink_href":"#cite_ref-33","nearest_preceding_main_text_book_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_main_text_chapter_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_main_text_section_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_book_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_chapter_heading":null,"nearest_preceding_transcription_section_heading":null,"original_callout":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"b4b310dee7356410f5184f86857274c932348d02b4f5b2656e4c0f9e19f67bd3"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"b4b310dee7356410f5184f86857274c932348d02b4f5b2656e4c0f9e19f67bd3","original_node_id":"cite_ref-33","source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_path":"raw/research/approved-family-refresh-0045/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd.html","source_sha256":"cf997eba08c583d94ab2a1c7dbebb3a1c8c693a8882c818e1beeb5c30486875c","text":"","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[13]/sup[3]"}}],"ancient_author_assignment_approved":false,"author_assignment_basis":{"historical_author_review":{"native_opening_witnesses":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"9215ebf503bf11bbe4d777dbe1c54f362fe8455a0dfa13e5562a9abb733edb7f"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"9215ebf503bf11bbe4d777dbe1c54f362fe8455a0dfa13e5562a9abb733edb7f","original_node_id":"mwBA","original_text":"III. Augustin’s Part in the Controversy.","tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[1]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551","original_node_id":"mwBg","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"38f20880f3821280fc0e2d0e446194c242300ab3818fa730e71ddc296769a76e"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"ba3dee7faa4fe13507c7a973c53c298ae6ad158c02fbd682beecde3b04f8ba72"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"ba3dee7faa4fe13507c7a973c53c298ae6ad158c02fbd682beecde3b04f8ba72","original_node_id":"mwFw","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"34369a94309a2565a4b7a2857c6c3c180922e61b624d6550fecb2d1dd7e276c5"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[3]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"a7c438932bf3d51a2f0ca1b93e13acc8aa9dac560cc7261025d2dececc7b26f6"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"a7c438932bf3d51a2f0ca1b93e13acc8aa9dac560cc7261025d2dececc7b26f6","original_node_id":"mwSA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"a184b0701589755f3bc7cd9473ce315637939fcc688e9d918951ce3fa23de9a2"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[4]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"a7287ee62dc5d5a0dd0e3cce7751bd288a6cf2bfc65edcdc7846244947e9c24a"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"a7287ee62dc5d5a0dd0e3cce7751bd288a6cf2bfc65edcdc7846244947e9c24a","original_node_id":"mwaw","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"26361392ed5b2a279b010cf22b1b9d8a984f9392c608c375bafc11fdc9493483"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[5]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"e0dc14e39f6cccf4241e8f25c6d22fee49468ffd9e246c50c75274afb7cd6c3e"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"e0dc14e39f6cccf4241e8f25c6d22fee49468ffd9e246c50c75274afb7cd6c3e","original_node_id":"mwig","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"d314cbc134e821692b9c48f781e288296780ab95096aea1d7cb7a1ca50330c2c"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[6]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"2924e26d62d2c73e8b55034976fc01517937eced30ee8db4e0a3890ae5fb7161"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"2924e26d62d2c73e8b55034976fc01517937eced30ee8db4e0a3890ae5fb7161","original_node_id":"mwpA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"451687af6f2058febd04520e1c53bb494c4cb3260e61fccc503ba71c16efd627"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[7]"},{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"2ea3a3c0ce52f37118d290b5919136f23159dc84ca1662b68eecfb5156e3d71a"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"2ea3a3c0ce52f37118d290b5919136f23159dc84ca1662b68eecfb5156e3d71a","original_node_id":"mwtA","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"9b4c21fd100554d3fa594df24fdec0031eb64a4a37a685c72848c74a52266d1b"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[8]"}],"original_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"original_catalogue_title":"Introductory Essay","original_edition_author_credit":{"original_text":{"$text_sha256":"4d983dd7da08237256e67b37ffb677ed33924da2e65bfc9f8b493b8da7cd824b"},"sha256":"4d983dd7da08237256e67b37ffb677ed33924da2e65bfc9f8b493b8da7cd824b","source_path":"raw/research/anf-npnf/archive/selectlibraryofn05auguuoft.ocr.txt","source_sha256":"57621031229ccc939004b19b6749e9057fd5990ad188c15e2a4957d8d92f8786","utf8_byte_end":1168,"utf8_byte_start":650},"original_signed_introduction_credits":[{"source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/3bbaeaf3823fa5604e6e.html","source_sha256":"af20a867fb8540646838301ad6b6525efbac5fed60232e2052d3d94903a24c8e","witness":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6b2e2f044b48ab72632c3bd944148b0e9da7767753154229f781355eb1eb67a8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6b2e2f044b48ab72632c3bd944148b0e9da7767753154229f781355eb1eb67a8","original_text":"by professor benjamin b. warfield, D.D.","tag":"p","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"}},{"source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe.html","source_sha256":"8389c3d3c4f4385f89fe18e81830457180f8038ff73fbdbce3e8a340b40b4a94","witness":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"f2514a93be9f4d2e52fd89027532955106edf3603f8c762a49e2a40c930625b8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"f2514a93be9f4d2e52fd89027532955106edf3603f8c762a49e2a40c930625b8","original_text":"by professor benjamin b. warfield, D.D.","tag":"p","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"}}]},"original_body_boundary":{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6193be02ae91f359768853f1799678ac312fad36399d976acb8a1862b0e4f551","original_node_id":"mwBg","original_text":{"$text_sha256":"38f20880f3821280fc0e2d0e446194c242300ab3818fa730e71ddc296769a76e"},"tag":"p","text_extraction_requires_review":null,"xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[2]"},"original_work_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"scope":"Qualified historical edition attribution; composition dates and verse exposition unreviewed"},"book_number_approved":false,"book_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"chapter_number_approved":false,"chapter_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"chapter_uncertain":true,"native_paragraph_number_prefix":null,"note_id":"cite_note-33","original_ancestor_location_witnesses":[],"original_main_text_heading_labels":[],"original_page_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"6a46250ff33eca16c5839001c21c87f1f993d82dcfbd18caae3cae49ba97f661"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"6a46250ff33eca16c5839001c21c87f1f993d82dcfbd18caae3cae49ba97f661","original_node_id":"mwDw","source_id":"9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-stage9/9fd1acb8ac3a8ddfd8fe.html","source_sha256":"8389c3d3c4f4385f89fe18e81830457180f8038ff73fbdbce3e8a340b40b4a94","text":"Augustin's Part in the Controversy","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[3]/a"}],"original_parent_paragraph_witness":null,"original_transcription_heading_labels":[],"original_work_catalogue_memberships":[{"dom_serialized_html":{"$text_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8"},"dom_serialized_sha256":"52b359d62130c5e5cb03e81f156900f8864af63bf822255fcfa4f4930ed95ff8","original_node_id":"mwEA","source_id":"26c58fbb5584d760f379","source_path":"raw/research/wikisource/patristic-series-volumes/26c58fbb5584d760f379.html","source_sha256":"1c01f465b7c2ccbf882c1ef01b7e5e5a9aa38770a491c117f41200b31549e551","text":"Introductory Essay","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ul/li[5]/a"}],"owner_verified_section_label":"Chapter uncertain; original source section: Augustin's Part in the Controversy","record_type":"editorial-footnote","section_number_approved":false,"section_number_inferred_from_URL":false,"source_author_assignment_approved":false,"source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_paragraph_index":null,"source_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay/Introductory_Essay/Augustin's_Part_in_the_Controversy","work_catalogue_url":"https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nicene_and_Post-Nicene_Fathers:_Series_I/Volume_V/Introductory_Essay"},"reference_proofs":[],"source_id":"0c811acf6c5d609e56bd","source_library_context_witnesses":[{"html":{"$text_sha256":"19f4162c1ca0d2290fe9c9b346df539aa398859f443164f720a316e9b56064c1"},"html_sha256":"19f4162c1ca0d2290fe9c9b346df539aa398859f443164f720a316e9b56064c1","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[1]/p[13]"}],"source_node":{"html":{"$text_sha256":"7993bd43f39c173baa9c0fffa2db1e8214badd94a7294e7c8dffcb1aff82bbee"},"html_sha256":"7993bd43f39c173baa9c0fffa2db1e8214badd94a7294e7c8dffcb1aff82bbee","xpath":"/html/body/div[3]/div/div[3]/main/div[3]/div[2]/div[1]/section[2]/ol/li[33]/span[2]"},"source_path":"raw/research/approved-family-refresh-0045/0c811acf6c5d609e56bd.html","source_record_file":"raw/review/source-library-note-batch-0060/original-source-records.jsonl","source_record_file_sha256":"b4720a3e7449f29393a9d742e4ad77e4b9f1eb941abe4be96090f8e5512c26e7","source_record_id":"ws-library-full-note:0c811acf6c5d609e56bd:cite_note-33","source_sha256":"cf997eba08c583d94ab2a1c7dbebb3a1c8c693a8882c818e1beeb5c30486875c","text_sha256":"1a91da1361b27d21f2654f55b6c0437dc2cab22832048e6eac93b0b3d51ecd04","type":"whole-source-library-dom"},"verified":true,"work":"Introductory Essay","work_id":"ws-augustine-antipelagian-npnf1-5-0c811acf6c5d609e56bd"}