64. What, then, constrains
you, what excites you to revile, to rail at, to hate implacably Him
whom no man
3382
can accuse
of any crime?
3383
Tyrants and your kings, who, putting away
all
fear of the gods,
plunder and pillage the treasuries of temples; who by proscription,
banishment,
3384
and
slaughter, strip the state of its nobles? who, with licentious
violence, undermine and wrest away the chastity of matrons and
maidens,—
these men
you name
indigites
and
divi
; and you worship with couches, altars, temples, and other
service, and by celebrating their games and birthdays, those whom it
was fitting that you should assail with keenest
3385
hatred. And all those, too, who
by writing books assail in many forms with biting reproaches public
manners; who censure, brand, and tear in pieces your luxurious habits
and lives; who carry down to posterity evil reports of their own
times
3386
in their
enduring writings; who
seek to
persuade
men
that the
rights of marriage should be held in common;
3387
who lie with boys, beautiful,
lustful, naked; who declare that you are beasts, runaways, exiles, and
mad and frantic slaves of the most worthless character,—
all
these
with wonder and applause you exalt to the stars of heaven,
you place in the shrines of your libraries, you present with chariots
and statues, and as much as in you lies, gift with a kind of
immortality, as it were, by the witness which immortal titles bear to
them. Christ alone you would tear in pieces,
3388
you would rend asunder, if you
could
do so to
a god; nay,
Him alone
you would, were it
allowed, gnaw with bloody mouths, and break His bones in pieces, and
devour Him like beasts of the field. For what that He has done,
tell, I pray you, for what crime?
3389
What has He done to turn aside
the course of justice, and rouse you to hatred made fierce by maddening
torments?
Is it
because He declared that He was sent by
the only
true
King
to be
your soul’s guardian, and
to bring to you the immortality which you believe that you
already
possess, relying on the assertions of a few men?
But
even
if you were assured that He spoke falsely, that He even
held out hopes without the slightest foundation, not even in this case
do I see
any
reason that you should hate
and
condemn Him
with bitter reproaches. Nay, if you were kind and gentle in
spirit, you ought to esteem Him even for this alone, that He promised
to you things which you might well wish and hope for; that He was the
bearer of good news; that His message was such as to trouble no
one’s mind, nay, rather to fill
all
with less anxious
expectation.
3390
3382
So the edd., reading
nemo h-om-i-n-um
, except Hildebrand
and Oehler, who retain the
ms.
om-n-i-um
—“no one of all.”
3383
John viii. 46
: “Which of you convinceth me of
sin?”
3384
So Heraldus and LB., followed by later edd., reading
exiliis
for the
ms.
ex-uis
, for
which Gelenius, Canterus, and Ursinus read
et
suis
—“and by their slaughters.”
3385
Here, as frequently in Arnobius, the comparative is used instead of the
superlative.
3386
“To posterity evil reports of their own time”—
sui
temporis posteris notas
—so emended by Ursinus, followed
by Orelli and Hildebrand, for the
ms.
in temporis posteri-s
, retained by LB., and with the omission of
s
in the 1st ed.; but this requires our looking on the passage
as defective.
3387
The reference is clearly to the well-known passage in
Plato’s
Republic.
[See the sickening details, book
v. p. 282, Jowett’s trans.]
3388
So Gelenius, LB., and Orelli,
reading
con-v-ell-e-re
for the
ms.
con-p-ell-a-re
, “to accost”
or “abuse,” which is out of place here. Canterus
suggested
com-p-il-are
, “to plunder,” which also
occurs in the sense “to cudgel.”
3389
Supply, “do you pursue Him so fiercely?”
3390
These words are followed in the edition of Gelenius by ch.
2–5 of the second book, seemingly without any mark to denote
transposition; while Ursinus inserted the same
chapters—beginning, however, with the last sentence of the first
chapter (read as mentioned in the note on it)—but prefixed an
asterisk, to mark a departure from the order of the
ms.
The later editors have not adopted either
change.