Bede : And now therefore I say to you: Depart from these men, and leave them alone. In the Greek, it is added: Not defiling your hands. — Retractions on Acts John Chrysostom : Then what is there, he would say, to hinder you to be overthrown? For, says he, "lest haply ye be found even to fight against God." He would dissuade them both by the consideration that the thing is impossible, and because it is not for their good. And he does not say by whom these people were destroyed, but that there they "were scattered," and their confederacy fell away to nothing. For if, says he, it be of man, what needs any ado on your part? but if it be of God, for all your ado you will not be able to overcome it. The argument is unanswerable. — Homily on Acts 14 Oecumenius : Gamaliel did not say that it is from God, but neither that the work is human. For with regard to what is from God, those men would immediately have opposed it, whereas what is from humans made them bolder against the apostles. Therefore observe the carefulness of the man Gamaliel, wisely managing his speech. He commands to wait for the outcome. Nor did he say, "And if you do not destroy it, know that it is from God," but "if it is from God, you will not be able to overthrow it." Let the former be attributed to the recklessness of those men, the latter to the power of God. They were persuaded that these things were spoken not in the presence of the apostles but apart. Moreover, since he was regarded as sharing their views and fearing the outcome as if it might actually occur, he imposed the matter upon them as well. Furthermore, the sweetness of his words combined with righteousness to help him persuade. — Commentary on Acts Oecumenius : Then, having therefore smoothed the discourse with them, he tries to turn aside the hearers from plotting against the apostles, for fear that, if they set out upon an unhindered occasion, we should, he says, by dying in opposition to God, fall into godlessness, and therefore, not being armed against those men but being armed for ourselves by the very nature of one who attacks what seems to be God, come to ruin for ourselves. For if there is a movement of mere human passion, fury against them is excessive. For destruction is attendant upon beginnings, as the examples suggest. Nor did he say plainly that the apostles were moved by God or by human impulse, but vaguely. For if he had said that they were from God, they would immediately have argued against him. But if he had said they were from men, he would again have made them easy targets for attack against the apostles. Therefore, having wisely ordered his discourse, he bids them await the outcome and not hurry into conduct about matters not yet known. For to fight against one who seems to be God does not destroy that thing but oneself. For if it is human, he says, what need have you of matters? But if it is divine, you will not be able by matters even to destroy it, so that it may not be thought rashly to proceed where the facts are unknown. [CHRYSOSTOM] — Commentary on Acts