Canon XIV.
Since
in certain provinces it is
permitted to the readers and singers to marry, the holy Synod has
decreed that it shall not be lawful for any of them to take a wife that
is heterodox. But those who have already begotten children of
such a marriage, if they have already had their children baptized among
the heretics, must bring them into the communion of the Catholic
Church; but if they have not had them baptized, they may not hereafter
baptize them among heretics, nor give them in marriage to a heretic, or
a Jew, or a heathen, unless the person marrying the orthodox child
shall promise to come over to the orthodox faith. And if any one
shall transgress this decree of the holy synod, let him be subjected to
canonical censure.
Notes.
Ancient Epitome of Canon
XIV.
A Cantor or Lector alien to the sound faith, if being
then married, he shall have begotten children let him bring them to
communion, if they had there been baptized. But if they had not
yet been baptized they shall not be baptized afterwards by the
heretics.
Aristenus.
The tenth and thirty-first canons of the Synod of
Laodicea and the second of the Sixth Synod in Trullo, and this present
canon forbid one of the orthodox to be joined in marriage with a woman
who is a heretic, or vice versa. But if any of the Cantors or
Lectors had taken a wife of another sect before these canons were set
forth, and had had children by her, and had had them baptized while yet
he remained among the heretics, these he should bring to the communion
of the Catholic Church. But if they had not yet been baptized, he
must not turn back and have them baptized among heretics. But
departing thence let him lead them to the Catholic Church and enrich
them with divine baptism.
Hefele.
According to the Latin translation of Dionysius Exiguus,
who speaks only of the
daughters
of the lectors, etc., the
meaning may be understood, with Christian Lupus, as being that only
their
daughters
must not be married to heretics or Jews or
heathen, but that the sons of readers may take wives who are heretics,
etc., because that men are less easily led to fall away from the faith
than women. But the Greek text makes here no distinction between
sons and daughters.
Bright.
It is to Victor that we owe the most striking of all
anecdotes about readers. During the former persecution under
Genseric (or Gaiseric), the Arians attacked a Catholic congregation on
Easter Sunday; and while a reader was standing alone in the pulpit, and
chanting the “Alleluia melody” (
cf
. Hammond,
Liturgies
, p. 95), an arrow pierced his throat, the
“codex” dropped from his hands, and he fell down dead
(
De Persec. Vand
., i., 13). Five years before the Council,
a boy of eight named Epiphanius was made a reader in the church of
Pavia, and in process of time became famous as its bishop.
Justinian forbade readers to be appointed under eighteen (Novel., 134,
13). The office is described in the Greek Euchologion as
“the first step to the priesthood,” and is conferred with
delivery of the book containing the Epistles. Isidore of Seville,
in the seventh century, tells us that the bishop ordained a reader by
delivering to him “coram plebe,” the “codex” of
Scripture: and after giving precise directions as to
pronunciation and accentuation, says that the readers were of old
called “heralds” (
De Eccl. Offic
., ii., 11).
(b) The Singers are placed by the xliij
rd
. Apostolic canon
between subdeacons and readers, but they rank below readers in Laodic.,
c. 23, in the Liturgy of St. Mark (Hammond, p. 173), and in the canons
wrongly ascribed to a
IV
th
Council
of Carthage, which permit a presbyter to appoint a
“psalmist” without the bishop’s knowledge, and rank
him even below the doorkeepers (Mansi, iii., 952). The chief
passage respecting the ancient “singers” is Laodic.,
xv.
The first part of this canon is found in the
Corpus
Juris Canonici
, Gratian’s
Decretum
, Pars I, Dist.
xxxii. c. xv.