Chapter XVII.—Marcion; His Dualism; Derives His System from
Empedocles; Sketch of the Doctrine of Empedocles.
But Marcion,
860
a native of Pontus, far more frantic than
these (heretics), omitting the majority of the tenets of the greater
number (of speculators), (and) advancing into a doctrine still more
unabashed, supposed (the existence of) two originating causes of the
universe, alleging one of them to be a certain good (principle), but
the other an evil one. And himself imagining that he was
introducing some novel (opinion), founded a school full of folly, and
attended by men of a sensual mode of life, inasmuch as he himself was
one of lustful propensities.
861
This (heretic) having thought that
the multitude would forget that he did not happen to be a disciple of
Christ, but of Empedocles,
862
who was far anterior to himself, framed and formed the same
opinions,—namely, that there are two causes of the universe,
discord and friendship. For what does Empedocles say respecting
the plan of the world? Even though we have previously spoken (on
this subject), yet even now also, for the purpose, at all events, of
comparing the heresy of this plagiarist (with its source), we shall not
be silent.
This (philosopher) affirms that all the elements out of
which the world consists and derives its being, are six: two of
them material, (viz.,) earth and water; and two of them instruments by
which material objects are arranged and altered, (viz.,) fire and air;
and two of them, by means of the instruments, operating upon matter and
fashioning it, viz., discord and friendship. (Empedocles)
expresses himself somehow thus:—
“The four roots of all things hear thou first:
Brilliant Jove, and life-giving Juno and Aidoneus,
And Nestis, who with tears bedews the mortal
font.”
863
Jupiter is fire, and life-giving Juno earth, which produces fruits
for the support of existence; and Aidoneus air, because although
through him we behold all things, yet himself alone we do not
see. But Nestis is water, for this is a sole vehicle of (food),
and thus becomes a cause of sustenance to all those that are being
nourished; (but) this of itself is not able to afford nutriment to
those that are being nourished. For if it did possess the power
of affording nutriment, animal life, he says, could never be destroyed
by famine, inasmuch as water is always superabundant in the
world. For this reason he denominates Nestis water, because,
(though indirectly) being a cause of nutriment, it is not (of itself)
competent to afford nutriment to those things that are being
nourished. These, therefore—to delineate them as by way of
outline—are the principles that comprise (Empedocles’)
entire theory of the world: (viz.,) water and earth, out of which
(proceed) generated entities; fire and spirit, (which are) instruments
and efficient (causes), but discord and friendship, which are
(principles) artistically fabricating (the universe). And
friendship is a certain peace, and unanimity, and love, whose entire
effort is, that there should be one finished and complete world.
Discord, however, invariably separates that one (world), and subdivides
it, or makes many things out of one. Therefore discord is of the
entire creation a cause which he styles “
oulomenon
,” that is, destructive.
For it is the concern of this (discord), that throughout every age the
creation itself should continue to preserve its existing
condition. And ruinous discord has been (thus) a fabricator and
an efficient cause of the production of all generated entities; whereas
friendship (is the cause) of the eduction, and alteration, and
restoration of existing things into one system. And in regard of
these (causes), Empedocles asserts that they are two immortal and
unbegotten principles, and such as have not as yet received an
originating cause of existence. (Empedocles) somewhere or other
(expresses himself) in the following manner:—
“For if both once it was, and will be; never, I
think,
Will be the age eternal void of both of
these.”
864
(But) what are these (two)? Discord and Friendship; for they
did not begin to come into being, but pre-existed and always will
exist, because, from the fact of their being unbegotten, they are not
able to undergo corruption. But fire, (and water,) and earth, and
air, are (entities) that perish and revive. For when these
generated (bodies), by reason of Discord, cease to exist, Friendship,
laying hold on them, brings them forward, and attaches and associates
them
herself with the
universe. (And this takes place) in order that the Universe may
continue one, being always ordered by Friendship in a manner one and
the same, and with (uninterrupted) uniformity.
When, however, Friendship makes unity out of plurality,
and associates with unity separated entities, Discord, again, forcibly
severs them from unity, and makes them many, that is, fire, water,
earth, air, (as well as) the animals and plants produced from these,
and whatever portions of the world we observe. And in regard of
the form of the world, what sort it is, (as) arranged by Friendship,
(Empedocles) expresses himself in the following terms:—
“For not from back two arms arise,
Not feet, not nimble knees, not genital groin,
But a globe it was, and equal to itself it
is.”
865
An operation of this description Friendship maintains, and makes
(one) most beautiful form of the world out of plurality. Discord,
however, the cause of the arrangement of each of the parts (of the
universe), forcibly severs and makes many things out of that one
(form). And this is what Empedocles affirms respecting his own
generation:—
“Of these I also am from God a wandering
exile.”
866
That is, (Empedocles) denominates as God the unity and unification
of that (one form) in which (the world) existed antecedent to the
separation and production (introduced) by Discord among the majority of
those things (that subsisted) in accordance with the disposition
(effected) by Discord. For Empedocles affirms Discord to be a
furious, and perturbed, and unstable Demiurge, (thus) denominating
Discord the creator of the world. For this constitutes the
condemnation and necessity of souls which Discord forcibly severs from
unity, and (which it) fashions and operates upon, (according to
Empedocles,) who expresses himself after some such mode as, the
following:—
“Who perjury piles on sin,
While demons gain a life
prolonged;”
867
meaning by demons long-lived souls, because they are immortal, and
live for lengthened ages:—
“For thrice ten thousand years banished from
bliss;”
868
denominating as blissful, those that have been collected by
Friendship from the majority of entities into the process of
unification (arising out) of the intelligible world. He asserts
that those are exiles, and that
“In lapse of time all sorts of mortal men are
born,
Changing the irksome ways of life.”
869
He asserts the irksome ways to be the alterations and
transfigurations of souls into (successive) bodies. This is what
he says:—
“Changing the irksome ways of life.”
For souls “change,” body after body being altered, and
punished by Discord, and not permitted to continue in the one (frame),
but that the souls are involved in all descriptions of punishment by
Discord being changed from body to body. He says:—
“Æthereal force to ocean drives the
souls,
And ocean spurts them forth on earth’s
expanse,
And earth on beams of blazing sun, who flings
(The souls) on æther’s depths, and each from
each
(A spirit) takes, and all with hatred
burn.”
870
This is the punishment which the Demiurge inflicts, just as some
brazier moulding (a piece of) iron, and dipping it successively from
fire into water. For fire is the æther whence the Demiurge
transfers the souls into the sea; and land is the earth: whence he uses
the words, from water into earth, and from earth into air. This is what
(Empedocles) says:—
“And earth on beams
Of blazing sun, who flings (the souls)
On æther’s depths, and each from each
A (spirit) takes, and all with hatred burn.”
The souls, then, thus detested, and tormented, and
punished in this world, are, according to Empedocles, collected by
Friendship as being a certain good (power), and (one) that pities the
groaning of these, and the disorderly and wicked device of furious
Discord. And (likewise Friendship is) eager, and toils to lead
forth little by little the souls from the world, and to domesticate
them with unity, in order that all things, being conducted by herself,
may attain unto unification. Therefore on account of such an
arrangement on the part of destructive Discord of this divided world,
Empedocles admonishes his disciples to abstain from all sorts of animal
food. For he asserts that the bodies of animals are such as feed
on the habitations of punished souls. And he teaches those who
are hearers of such doctrines (as his), to refrain from intercourse
with women. (And he issues this precept) in order that (his
disciples) may not co-operate with and assist those works which Discord
fabricates, always dissolving and forcibly severing the work of
Friendship. Empedocles asserts that this is the greatest law of
the management of the universe, expressing himself somehow
thus:—
“There’s something swayed by Fate, the
ancient,
Endless law of gods, and sealed by potent
oaths.”
871
He thus calls Fate the alteration from unity into plurality,
according to Discord, and from plu
rality into unity, according to
Friendship. And, as I stated, (Empedocles asserts) that there are
four perishable gods, (viz.,) fire, water, earth, (and) air. (He
maintains,) however, that there are two (gods) which are immortal,
unbegotten, (and) continually hostile one to the other, (namely)
Discord and Friendship. And (he asserts) that Discord always is
guilty of injustice and covetousness, and forcible abduction of the
things of Friendship, and of appropriation of them to itself. (He
alleges,) however, that Friendship, inasmuch as it is always and
invariably a certain good (power), and intent on union, recalls and
brings towards (itself), and reduces to unity, the parts of the
universe that have been forcibly severed, and tormented, and punished
in the creation by the Demiurge. Some such system of philosophy
as the foregoing is advanced for us by Empedocles concerning the
generation of the world, and its destruction, and its constitution, as
one consisting of what is good and bad. And he says that there is
likewise a certain third power which is cognised by intellect, and that
this can be understood from these, (viz., Discord and Friendship,)
expressing himself somehow thus:—
“For if, ’neath hearts of oak, these truths
you fix,
And view them kindly in meditations pure,
Each one of these, in lapse of time, will haunt you,
And many others, sprung of these, descend.
For into every habit these will grow, as Nature
prompts;
But if for other things you sigh, which, countless,
linger
Undisguised ’mid men, and blunt the edge of
care,
As years roll on they’ll leave you fleetly,
Since they yearn to reach their own beloved race;
For know that all possess perception and a share
of mind.”
872
860
See [vol. i. p. 352, this series]; Irenæus i. 27; [vol.
iii., this series especially p. 257], Tertullian,
Adv. Marc
.,
and
Præscript
., xxx.; Epiphanius,
Hær
., xlii.;
Theodoret,
Hær. Fab
., i. 24; Eusebius.,
Hist.
Ecclesiast
., v. 13, 16; and St. Augustine,
Hær
.,
xxii.
861
Or,
“quarrelsome,” or, “frantic.”
862
Hippolytus’ discussion respecting the heresy of Marcion is
chiefly interesting from the light which it throws on the philosophy of
Empedocles.
863
These
are lines 55–57 in Karsten’s edition of a collection of the
Empedoclean verses.
864
These are lines 110, 111, in Stein’s edition of
Empedocles
.
865
Lines
360–362 (ed. Karst.).
866
Line 7
(Karsten), 381 (Stein).
867
Line
4 (Karsten), 372, 373 (Stein).
868
Line
5 (Karsten), 374 (Stein).
869
Line 6
(Karsten), 375, 376 (Stein).
870
Lines
16–19 (Karsten), 377–380(Stein).
871
Lines
1, 2 (Karsten), 369, 370 (Stein).
872
The text of these verses, as given by Hippolytus, is obviously
corrupt, and therefore obscure. Schneidewin has furnished an
emended copy of them (
Philol
., vi. 166), which the translator
has mostly adopted. (See Stein’s edition of the
Empedoclean Verses
, line 222 et seq.)