Chapter XVI.
How the meek and the passionate are to be
admonished.
(
Admonition
17.) Differently to be
admonished are the meek and the passionate. For sometimes the
meek, when they are in authority, suffer from the torpor of sloth,
which is a kindred disposition, and as it were placed hard by.
And for the most part from the laxity of too great gentleness they
soften the force of strictness beyond need. But on the other hand
the passionate, in that they are swept on into frenzy of mind by the
impulse of anger, break up the calm of quietness, and so throw into
confusion the life of those that are put under them. For, when
rage drives them headlong, they know not what
they do in their anger, they know not what in
their anger they suffer from themselves. But sometimes, what is
more serious, they think the goad of their anger to be the zeal of
righteousness. And, when vice is believed to be virtue, guilt is
piled up without fear. Often, then, the meek grow torpid in the
laziness of inactivity; often the passionate are deceived by the zeal
of uprightness. Thus to the virtue of the former a vice is
unawares adjoined, but to the latter their vice appears as though it
were fervent virtue. Those, therefore, are to be admonished to
fly what is close beside themselves, these to take heed to what is in
themselves; those to discern what they have not, these what they
have. Let the meek embrace solicitude; let the passionate ban
perturbation. The meek are to be admonished that they study to
have also the zeal of righteousness: the passionate are to be
admonished that to the zeal which they think they have they add
meekness. For on this account the Holy Spirit has been manifested
to us in a dove and in fire; because, to wit, all whom He fills He
causes to shew themselves as meek with the simplicity of the dove, and
burning with the fire of zeal.
He then is in no wise full of the Holy Spirit, who
either in the calm of meekness forsakes the fervour of zeal, or again
in the ardour of zeal loses the virtue of meekness. Which thing
we shall perhaps better shew, if we bring forward the authority of
Paul, who to two who were his disciples, and endowed with a like
charity, supplies nevertheless different aids for preaching. For
in admonishing Timothy he says,
Reprove, entreat, rebuke, with all
long-suffering and doctrine
(
2 Tim. iv. 2
). Titus also he admonishes,
saying,
These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all
authority
(
Tit. ii.
15
). What is the reason
that he dispenses his teaching with so great art as, in exhibiting it,
to recommend authority to the one, and long-suffering to the other,
except that he saw Titus to be of a meeker spirit, and Timothy of one a
little more fervid? The former he inflames with the earnestness
of zeal; the latter he moderates by the gentleness of
long-suffering. To the one he adds what is wanting, from the
other he subtracts what is overabundant. The one he endeavours to
push on with a spur, the other to keep back with a bridle. For
the great husbandman who has the Church in charge waters some shoots
that they may grow, but prunes others when he sees that they grow too
much; lest either by not growing they should bear no fruit, or by
growing over much they should lose the fruits they may put forth.
But far different is the anger that creeps in under the guise of zeal
from that which confounds the perturbed heart without pretext of
righteousness. For the former is extended inordinately in that
wherein it ought to be, but the latter is ever kindled in that wherein
it ought not to be. It should indeed be known that in this the
passionate differ from the impatient, that the latter bear not with
things brought upon them by others, but the former themselves bring on
things to be borne with. For the passionate often follow after
those who shun them, stir up occasion of strife, rejoice in the toil of
contention; and yet such we better correct, if in the midst of the
commotion of their anger we do shun them. For, while they are
perturbed, they do not know what we say to them; but, when brought back
to themselves, they receive words of exhortation the more freely in
proportion as they blush at having been the more calmly borne
with. But to a mind that is drunk with fury every right thing
that is said appears wrong. Whence to Nabal when he was drunk
Abigail laudably kept silence about his fault, but, when he had
digested his wine, as laudably told him of it (
1 Sam. xxv. 37
). For he could for this reason
perceive the evil he had done, that he did not hear of it when
drunk.
But when the passionate so attack others that they
cannot be altogether shunned, they should be smitten, not with open
rebuke, but sparingly with a certain respectful cautiousness. And
this we shall shew better if we bring forward what was done by
Abner. For, when Asahel attacked him with the violence of
inconsiderate haste, it is written,
Abner spake unto Asahel, saying.
Turn thee aside from following me, lest I be driven to smite thee to
the ground. Howbeit he scorned to listen, and refused to turn
aside. Whereupon Abner smote him with the hinder end of the spear
in the groin, and thrust him through, and he died
(
2 Sam. ii. 22,
23
). For of whom
did Asahel present a type but of those whom fury violently seizes and
carries headlong? And such, in this same attack of fury, are to
be shunned cautiously in proportion as they are madly hurried on.
Whence also Abner, who in our speech is called the lantern of the
father, fled; because when the tongue of teachers, which indicates the
supernal light of
God
, sees the mind of any
one borne along over the steeps of rage, and refrains from casting back
darts of words against the angry person, it is as though it were
unwilling to smite one that is pursuing. But, when the passionate
will not pacify themselves by any consideration, and, like Asahel,
cease not to pursue and to be mad, it is necessary that those who
endeavour
to repress these
furious ones should by no means lift themselves up in fury, but exhibit
all possible calmness; and yet adroitly bring something to bear whereby
they may by a side thrust prick the heart of the furious one.
Whence also Abner, when he made a stand against his pursuer, pierced
him, not with a direct stroke, but with the hinder end of his
spear. For to strike with the point is to oppose with an onset of
open rebuke: but to smite the pursuer with the hinder end of the
spear is calmly to touch the furious one with certain hits, and, as it
were, by sparing him overcome him. Asahel moreover straightway
fell, because agitated minds, when they feel themselves to be spared,
and yet are touched inwardly by the answers given in calmness, fall at
once from the elevation to which they had raised themselves.
Those, then, who rebound from the onset of their heat under the stroke
of gentleness die, as it were, without steel.